Lee v. Lee

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lee v. Lee

168 So. 2d 903, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2034

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 30, 1964

DocketNo. 10256

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 2d 903 (Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Lee, 168 So. 2d 903, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2034 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

AYRES, Judge.

Defendant appealed from a judgment making executory an award of past-due alimony and directing that a writ of fieri facias issue therefor. The appellant has neither appeared nor filed a brief in this court.

Under Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section S (b), 8 LSA-R.S., the court may, ex proprio motu, “Consider abandoned and dismiss the appeal in any case in which the appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief prior to the date fixed for submission of the case * *

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AYRES, Judge.

Defendant appealed from a judgment making executory an award of past-due alimony and directing that a writ of fieri facias issue therefor. The appellant has neither appeared nor filed a brief in this court.

Under Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section S (b), 8 LSA-R.S., the court may, ex proprio motu, “Consider abandoned and dismiss the appeal in any case in which the appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief prior to the date fixed for submission of the case * *

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 2d 903, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 2034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-lee-lactapp-1964.