Lee v. Lee

51 Ill. App. 565, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 643
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 27, 1893·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

Appellee having filed her bill for divorce, afterward went with her husband, appellant, to a hotel in Chicago, and there, occupying the same room, lived with him for some months. This she does not deny; she merely declares that they did not occupy the same bed or “ cohabit.” We do not care to go into a consideration of the truth of her statement in this regard.

Apparently she was then living with him as his wife; by her own confession her conduct was such as to be utterly inconsistent with the maintenance of her suit, and such that she is not permitted, for the matters in her bill alleged, to ask a decree of divorce.

The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Lee, 51 Ill. App. 565, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 643 (Ill. Ct. App. 1893).

51 Ill. App. 565 (Lee v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
215 A.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
197 A.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Huffine v. Huffine
74 N.E.2d 764 (Van Wert County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Phinizy v. Phinizy
114 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)