Lee v. Lee

399 So. 2d 62, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28270
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 1981
DocketNo. 80-1625
StatusPublished

This text of 399 So. 2d 62 (Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Lee, 399 So. 2d 62, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268, 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); re[63]*63view denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Creel v. Creel, 378 So.2d 1251, 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1111 (Fla.1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosen v. Rosen
386 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Herzog v. Herzog
346 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Creel v. Creel
378 So. 2d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 So. 2d 62, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-lee-fladistctapp-1981.