Lee v. Lee

15 F. Cas. 209, 4 D.C. 643, 4 Cranch 643

This text of 15 F. Cas. 209 (Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Lee, 15 F. Cas. 209, 4 D.C. 643, 4 Cranch 643 (circtddc 1835).

Opinion

But the CouRT

(MoRSell, J., dissenting,)

refused to give the instruction ; being of opinion that an inhabitant of Washington county could not, under the'9lh section of the Act of Congress of the 24th of June, 1812, [2 Stat. at Large, 755,] remove his slaves from Alexandria county to Washington county; he not being an inhabitant of the county in which the slaves were, and possessing them therein.

The verdict was for the defendant; and the Court refused to grant a new trial, which was moved for on the ground that the verdict was against the law and the evidence, in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F. Cas. 209, 4 D.C. 643, 4 Cranch 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-lee-circtddc-1835.