Lee v. Knezovich
This text of Lee v. Knezovich (Lee v. Knezovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE 2 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Jun 01, 2020 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6
7 JOHN JOSEPH LEE, NO: 2:20-CV-2-RMP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR 9 v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE REQUIREMENTS 10 OZZIE KNEZOVICH, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and 11 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 12 Defendants. 13
14 By Order filed March 31, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a 15 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and to submit a certified copy of 16 his six-month inmate trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 17 period immediately preceding January 2, 2020 within twenty one days of the date of 18 that Order. ECF No. 3. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised he could pay the full 19 $400.00 filing fee. Id. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to do so would result 20 in the dismissal of this case. Id. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor returned 21 the application to proceed in forma pauperis along with his six-month inmate trust 1 account statement (or institutional equivalent) by the due date of April 21, 2020. 2 A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at Spokane County Detention 3 Services and returned as undeliverable on April 8, 2020, with the notation, “Not in 4 jail.” ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not kept the Court apprised of his current address
5 and has filed nothing further in this action. 6 Parties filing actions in the United States District Court are required to pay 7 filing fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed without the immediate
8 payment of a filing fee only upon granting of in forma pauperis status. See 28 9 U.S.C. § 1915. Failure to pay the statutory filing fee will result in dismissal of 10 these actions without prejudice. See Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th 11 Cir. 1995) (district court has authority to dismiss without prejudice prisoner
12 complaint for failure to pay partial filing fee); In re Perroton, 958 F.2d 889, 890 13 (9th Cir. 1992) (affirming dismissal of appeal of pro se litigant for failure to pay 14 required filing fees).
15 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without 16 prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee or filing a properly completed Application 17 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a).
18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this 2 Order, enter judgment, forward copies to Plaintiff at the address provided, and 3 CLOSE the file. 4 DATED June 1, 2020.
5 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson 6 ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17
18 19 20 21
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lee v. Knezovich, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-knezovich-waed-2020.