Lee v. Johns

Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Johns

450 F. App'x 274

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2011·No. No. 11-6762·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Pearson Lee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Johns, No. 5:09-hc-02072-D, 2011 WL 1750799 (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the [275]*275facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Pearson Lee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Johns, No. 5:09-hc-02072-D, 2011 WL 1750799 (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the [275]*275facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lee v. Johns, 450 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

450 F. App'x 274 (Lee v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related