Lee v. ING Groep, N.V.

138 S. Ct. 419, 199 L. Ed. 2d 277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. ING Groep, N.V.. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 S. Ct. 975
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 30, 2017·No. No. 17–5676.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until November 20, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. ING Groep, N.V., 138 S. Ct. 419, 199 L. Ed. 2d 277 (U.S. 2017).

138 S. Ct. 419 (Lee v. ING Groep, N.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.