Lee v. HDR Global Trading Limited

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 5/27/2025 Drew Lee and Felix Lufkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 1:20-cv-03232 (ALC) (SDA) -against- ORDER HDR Global Trading Limited, et al., Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: In accordance with the Court’s April 28, 2025 Order (ECF No. 251), no later than May 9, 2025, Plaintiff Drew Lee was directed to file with the Court a letter indicating whether he intended to continue prosecuting this case pro se. Mr. Lee has yet to file a letter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, no later than June 17, 2025, Mr. Lee shall file a letter with the Court stating whether he intends to continue prosecuting his claims in this case. The letter may be submitted in person to the Pro Se Intake Unit located at 500 Pearl Street, Room 205, New York, NY 10007, or can be emailed to ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including dismissal of Mr. Lee’s claims for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).+

1 “TA) district court may—based on both its inherent authority and Rule 41(b)—dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order.” Hall v. Oriska Corp. Gen. Contracting, 2022 WL 17420307, at *2 (2d Cir. Dec. 6, 2022).

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York May 27, 2025

STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge