Lee v. Havens
1 Brayt. 93
Opinion
The administrator, appointed in Massachusetts, only, has not, as such, any interest, whatever, in the property, left by the deceased, in this State, and can exercise no control over such property.
2. The note in question, is property of the deceased, in this State, where the debtor resided. The plaintiff obtained no right to the note, by the endorsement, and cannot sustain this action.
The plaintiff became non-suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Havens, 1 Brayt. 93 (Vt. 1820).
1 Brayt. 93 (Lee v. Havens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.