Lee v. Harris

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lee v. Harris

21 So. 2d 512, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 327

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 4, 1945

DocketNo. 2707.

StatusPublished

This text of 21 So. 2d 512 (Lee v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Harris, 21 So. 2d 512, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 327 (La. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinions

On Rehearing. I have carefully read and considered the pleadings, the evidence, the written briefs and oral arguments of Counsel, and the opinion rendered herein by this Court speaking through Judge OTT upon the first hearing.

Since I have reached the conclusion that Judge OTT'S opinion on said first hearing succinctly and correctly states both the law and the facts, it would serve no useful purpose to write an additional opinion merely to express those natural differences in language which any two lawyers in agreement would indulge in.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned by Judge OTT, it is ordered that his said opinion on the original hearing by this Court is made the opinion of this Court on rehearing, and, accordingly, that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby affirmed at the cost of appellant in both Courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing. I have carefully read and considered the pleadings, the evidence, the written briefs and oral arguments of Counsel, and the opinion rendered herein by this Court speaking through Judge OTT upon the first hearing.

Since I have reached the conclusion that Judge OTT'S opinion on said first hearing succinctly and correctly states both the law and the facts, it would serve no useful purpose to write an additional opinion merely to express those natural differences in language which any two lawyers in agreement would indulge in.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned by Judge OTT, it is ordered that his said opinion on the original hearing by this Court is made the opinion of this Court on rehearing, and, accordingly, that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby affirmed at the cost of appellant in both Courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 So. 2d 512, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-harris-lactapp-1945.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack