Lee v. Hamilton

177 A.D. 913

This text of 177 A.D. 913 (Lee v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Hamilton, 177 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Dome v. Southern Railway Company (152 App. Div. 134). Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Shearn, JJ.; Scott and Shearn, JJ., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dome v. Southern Railway Co.
152 A.D. 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-hamilton-nyappdiv-1917.