Lee v. Hamilton
177 A.D. 913
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Dome v. Southern Railway Company (152 App. Div. 134). Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Shearn, JJ.; Scott and Shearn, JJ., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Hamilton, 177 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
177 A.D. 913 (Lee v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dome v. Southern Railway Co.
152 A.D. 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)