Lee v. Goord
This text of 272 A.D.2d 696 (Lee v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of possessing unauthorized organizational materials and smuggling as the result of an incident in which he was searched and several unauthorized papers were found. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report, and the testimony of the correction officer who discovered the unauthorized papers, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Zarvela v Goord, 270 AD2d 532, 533; Matter of Velez v Goord, 262 AD2d 906). Petitioner’s proffered defense that the unauthorized materials were not his but rather belonged to another inmate [697]*697presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Daum v Goord, 270 AD2d 745, 746). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 696, 708 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.