Lee v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lee v. Gomez

62 So. 3d 1279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9592, 2011 WL 2500236

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 2011

Docket3D10-1726

StatusPublished

This text of 62 So. 3d 1279 (Lee v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Gomez, 62 So. 3d 1279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9592, 2011 WL 2500236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

Based on the appellee’s proper confession of error, we reverse the final judgment on attorney’s fees and costs and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall make the findings required under Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). Johnson v. Amritt, 48 So.3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

Based on the appellee’s proper confession of error, we reverse the final judgment on attorney’s fees and costs and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall make the findings required under Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). Johnson v. Amritt, 48 So.3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 So. 3d 1279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9592, 2011 WL 2500236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-gomez-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack