Lee v. Glover

8 Cow. 189
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 Cow. 189 (Lee v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Glover, 8 Cow. 189 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

* Curia, per Sutherland, J.

This case is distinguishable in only two particulars, from that of Goodell v. Jackson, (20 John. 188 and 693 :) 1. In that case it appeared that the Indian who made the grant, resided with the tribe of Oneida Indians; 2d. He expressed his dissent from the grant, by subsequently conveying to another. In this case neither of those facts exist; nor do, they appear to me to be material.

The opinion of Kent, 0., in Goodell v. Jackson, which was concurred in by the court of errors, decides, that by the constitution and statute law of this state, no white person can purchase any title to land, from any one or more Indians, either individually or collectively, without the authority and consent of the legislature; that it was immaterial [190]*190from what source the property proceeded, and whether it was owned by tribes, families or individuals; that if it be Indian property in land, it is protected by our constitution and laws.

Heither the terms nor spirit of the constitutional provisions, are confined to Indians residing with their tribe. After it has been decided that these provisions extend to the individual property of a single Indian, acquired by purchase, or as the reward of his military services, they must be held to apply, whether the Indian reside within the body of his nation, or separate and apart from them. It is analogous to the disability of infants to contract, in not depending on the actual capacity to protect his own rights. There must be judgment for the plaintiff, with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer, and rejoin on pay ment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Regis Tribe of Mohawk Indians v. State
5 A.D.2d 117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Terrance v. Crowley
62 Misc. 138 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Jackson ex dem. Smith v. Goodell
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 231 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1799)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cow. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-glover-nysupct-1828.