Lee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
143 A.D. 959, 128 N.Y.S. 1131
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without considering the question of the right of the foreign administrator to be made a party to the action. (See Flandrow v. [960]*960Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325, and cases therein cited.) All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the answer cannot be stricken out ■on this motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 143 A.D. 959, 128 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 959 (Lee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flandrow v. Hammond
13 A.D. 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)