Lee v. . Driggers

29 S.E.2d 682, 224 N.C. 857, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 332
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 19, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 S.E.2d 682 (Lee v. . Driggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. . Driggers, 29 S.E.2d 682, 224 N.C. 857, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 332 (N.C. 1944).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Upon the pleadings in the case the liability of the estate of Rosa Parham, deceased, was made to depend upon whether she signed the note by way of accommodation to her son, J. M. Parham. It was largely a question of fact which the jury has settled. And the case on appeal fails to show prejudicial error.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Carolinas Medical Center
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1995

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E.2d 682, 224 N.C. 857, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-driggers-nc-1944.