Lee v. Douglas Gibbons & Co.

258 A.D. 717, 14 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6578
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted to the extent of directing (1) that the plaintiff state the date of the agreement of employment alleged in paragraph fourth of the complaint and the dates between which the alleged services thereunder were rendered by plaintiff; and (2) that plaintiff eliminate from paragraph sixth of the complaint the conjunctive-disjunctive form “ and/or ” which renders the allegations equivocal, uncertain and indefinite, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Douglas Gibbons & Co., 258 A.D. 717, 14 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 717 (Lee v. Douglas Gibbons & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Air Engineers, Inc. v. Reese
217 So. 2d 66 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Sicherman v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
188 Misc. 265 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Kleinfeld v. Roburn Agencies, Inc.
270 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)