Lee v. Curtiss

17 Johns. 86
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 17 Johns. 86 (Lee v. Curtiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Curtiss, 17 Johns. 86 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Let the record be amended by striking out the verdict and judgment, and entering, in their stead, a judgment of nonsuit.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilman v. Libbey
10 F. Cas. 406 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1878)
Audubon v. . Excelsior Insurance Company
27 N.Y. 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)
Williams v. Wheeler
1 Barb. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
Messenger v. Broom
1 Pin. 630 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Johns. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-curtiss-nysupct-1819.