Lee v. City of Thomaston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lee v. City of Thomaston

94 S.E. 265, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 31, 1917

Docket9030

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 265 (Lee v. City of Thomaston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 265, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The petition for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute (Acts 1902, p. 105, Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a)); and under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. 345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The petition for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute (Acts 1902, p. 105, Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a)); and under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. 345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 265, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-city-of-thomaston-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack