Lee v. City of Thomaston
94 S.E. 265, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
Opinion
The petition for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute (Acts 1902, p. 105, Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a)); and under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. 345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 265, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
94 S.E. 265 (Lee v. City of Thomaston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toliver v. Mayor of Wrightsville
86 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Hubert v. City of Thomasville
90 S.E. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Gillespie v. Mayor of Macon
90 S.E. 970 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)