Lee v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Lee v. City of Seattle

433 P.3d 806, 192 Wash. 2d 1017

Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 2019·No. No. 96075-5·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both the motion for extension of time to file a reply and the petition for review are denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both the motion for extension of time to file a reply and the petition for review are denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Lee v. City of Seattle, 433 P.3d 806, 192 Wash. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

433 P.3d 806 (Lee v. City of Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.