Lee v. City of Mobile

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Lee v. City of Mobile

227 So. 2d 441, 45 Ala. App. 155, 1969 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 191

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 21, 1969·No. 1 Div. 51·Published

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The prosecution against this defendant, for a violation of a city ordinance, originated in the recorder’s court of the City of Mobile. From a judgment of conviction in the recorder’s court, the defendant appealed to the circuit court, and was there by agreement, tried upon the original complaint.

From a judgment of conviction in the circuit court this appeal is taken, but no question is presented for the consideration of this court, as no assignment of error is made as the law requires. For want of assignment of errors, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed. See 15 Ala. Digest Municipal Corporations 642(1) for numerous cases.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The prosecution against this defendant, for a violation of a city ordinance, originated in the recorder’s court of the City of Mobile. From a judgment of conviction in the recorder’s court, the defendant appealed to the circuit court, and was there by agreement, tried upon the original complaint.

From a judgment of conviction in the circuit court this appeal is taken, but no question is presented for the consideration of this court, as no assignment of error is made as the law requires. For want of assignment of errors, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed. See 15 Ala. Digest Municipal Corporations 642(1) for numerous cases.

Affirmed.

Lee v. City of Mobile, 227 So. 2d 441, 45 Ala. App. 155, 1969 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 191 (Ala. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

227 So. 2d 441 (Lee v. City of Mobile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.