Lee v. City of Decatur

172 So. 287, 233 Ala. 415, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 47

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. City of Decatur. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 Ala. 411 →

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 21, 1937·No. 3 Div. 188.·Published

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a companion case to 172 So. 284, (3 Div. 191) 1 between the same parties, involving the same subject matter, the same legal questions, and looking to the same relief.

No. 191 was a mandamus proceeding, while this is under the Declaratory Judgment Act. Both were submitted and argued together.

This cause is affirmed on the authority of the decision in 172 So. 284, 1 this day rendered.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Ante, p. 411.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a companion case to 172 So. 284, (3 Div. 191) 1 between the same parties, involving the same subject matter, the same legal questions, and looking to the same relief.

No. 191 was a mandamus proceeding, while this is under the Declaratory Judgment Act. Both were submitted and argued together.

This cause is affirmed on the authority of the decision in 172 So. 284, 1 this day rendered.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Ante, p. 411.

Lee v. City of Decatur, 172 So. 287, 233 Ala. 415, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 47 (Ala. 1937).

Pincite

172 So. 287 (Lee v. City of Decatur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Lee v. City of Decatur

172 So. 284 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)

Opinion

Related