Lee v. Cassin

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Lee v. Cassin

15 F. Cas. 146, 2 D.C. 112, 2 Cranch 112

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJune 15, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 F. Cas. 146 (Lee v. Cassin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Cassin, 15 F. Cas. 146, 2 D.C. 112, 2 Cranch 112 (circtddc 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

The CotrRT,

(Morsell, J., not sitting,)

was of opinion that on a note payable on demand, the cause of action does not accrue so as to make the statute of limitations begin to run until a demand be made. That the removal of the defendant from Massachusetts, before the cause of action accrued, was a bar to the statute of limitations of Massachusetts; and the replication that the plaintiff was beyond seas, was a bar to the statute of Maryland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The CotrRT,

(Morsell, J., not sitting,)

was of opinion that on a note payable on demand, the cause of action does not accrue so as to make the statute of limitations begin to run until a demand be made. That the removal of the defendant from Massachusetts, before the cause of action accrued, was a bar to the statute of limitations of Massachusetts; and the replication that the plaintiff was beyond seas, was a bar to the statute of Maryland.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. Cas. 146, 2 D.C. 112, 2 Cranch 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-cassin-circtddc-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack