Lee v. Cardington

999 N.E.2d 695, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1440

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 24, 2013·No. 2013-1400·Published

Opinion

Morrow App. No. 12CA0017, 2013-Ohio-3108. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., would also accept Proposition of Law No. II. O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Cardington, 999 N.E.2d 695, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 695 (Lee v. Cardington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.