Lee v. Brockett

Eighth Circuit

Lee v. Brockett

201 F. 1021, 119 C.C.A. 666

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1912

DocketNo. 3,711

StatusPublished

This text of 201 F. 1021 (Lee v. Brockett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. Brockett, 201 F. 1021, 119 C.C.A. 666 (8th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only assignment of error mentioned in the brief Is as follows: “The only error assigned to which we now desire to direct the attention of the court is that the court erroneously charged the jury as to the law in the case.” The assignment then quotes that part of the charge complained of. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, presented no requests to charge, and took no excentions to the charge as given. The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only assignment of error mentioned in the brief Is as follows: “The only error assigned to which we now desire to direct the attention of the court is that the court erroneously charged the jury as to the law in the case.” The assignment then quotes that part of the charge complained of. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, presented no requests to charge, and took no excentions to the charge as given. The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 F. 1021, 119 C.C.A. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-brockett-ca8-1912.