Lee v. Bonner
This text of Lee v. Bonner (Lee v. Bonner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION
WENDOLYN LEE, #18103194 PLAINTIFF
VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-cv-25-KS-JCG SHERIFF FLOYD BONNER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [12] TO AMEND
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend [12] filed on July 28, 2021. On July 27, 2021, a Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal [10] and Final Judgment [11] dismissing this civil action were entered. Because the instant civil action is closed as a result of the dismissal, see Order [10] and J. [11], and the Motion [12] cannot be construed in a way that relief is possible, it is properly considered “a meaningless, unauthorized motion.” See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994) (holding that a motion filed in a closed case is to be considered “a meaningless, unauthorized motion”). The Court therefore is without jurisdictional bases to consider the merits of Plaintiff’s Motion [12]. See Mayberry v. Stephens, 555 F. App’x 419, 420 (5th Cir. 2014) (citing Early, 27 F.3d at 142). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion [12] to Amend is denied. This the 29th day of July, 2021. s/Keith Starrett UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lee v. Bonner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-bonner-mssd-2021.