Lee v. Biderman

572 N.E.2d 47, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 461
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 572 N.E.2d 47 (Lee v. Biderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Biderman, 572 N.E.2d 47, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 461 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]). General Construction Law § 25-a did not here effect an extension when the time provided in CPLR 5513 expired on February 22, 1991 (see, General Construction Law § 24). Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5513
New York CVP § 5513
§ 24
New York GCN § 24
§ 25
New York GCN § 25

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 N.E.2d 47, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-biderman-ny-1991.