Lee v. Bennett

Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Bennett

74 F. App'x 282

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2003·No. No. 03-7053·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Avery Ledyard Lee, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lee v. Bennett, No. CA-03-423-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Avery Ledyard Lee, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lee v. Bennett, No. CA-03-423-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Lee v. Bennett, 74 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

74 F. App'x 282 (Lee v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related