Lee v. Belcher

165 So. 2d 913, 42 Ala. App. 373, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 271
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided August 18, 1964·No. 2 Div. 100·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Suit on a note. Having retained other counsel, the losing promissor now-appeals.

At the threshold, we are asked by the appellee to strike the appellant’s brief. ' The motion to strike continues:

“2. That the case be affirmed because of Appellant’s failure to insist upon or argue in said brief any assignments of error; or,
[374]*374“3. Such other orders or decrees or judgments that this Court deems meet and proper.”

We consider the motion well taken. Lee v. Belcher, 276 Ala. 384, 162 So.2d 478.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Belcher, 165 So. 2d 913, 42 Ala. App. 373, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 271 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

165 So. 2d 913 (Lee v. Belcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. Belcher
162 So. 2d 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)