Lee v. Beck

162 So. 870, 120 Fla. 466, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1418
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 So. 870 (Lee v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Beck, 162 So. 870, 120 Fla. 466, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1418 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the petition of James J. Hanna to intervene in this cause and be made a party to it in the Supreme Court, it is ordered that said petition be denied and that the constitutional writ under Section 5 of Article V of the Constitution be also denied, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to pursue any appropriate legal remedy for the issuance of license to petitioner for the use and operation of the slot machines alleged to be owned by him, or to seek any appropriate writ for the protection of his rights, if any he may have in the premises, pending the final determination of any such proceeding as he may elect to institute, it appearing that petitioner herein has never become a party to, nor bound by, *467 the decree appealed from in this particular case wherein he seeeks leave to intervene.

Intervention as party to appeal denied.

Constitutional writ denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Davis, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickinson v. Segal
219 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 870, 120 Fla. 466, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-beck-fla-1935.