Lee v. ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY, LP

925 N.E.2d 920, 14 N.Y.3d 786

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2010·No. Mo. No. 2010-27·Published

Opinion

14 N.Y.3d 786 (2010)

JAMES D. LEE, Respondent,
v.
ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY, L.P., et al., Appellants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants.
ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Mo. No. 2010-27.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Submitted January 19, 2010. Decided March 25, 2010.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 13 NY3d 382 (2009)].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 N.Y.3d 786 (2010)

JAMES D. LEE, Respondent,
v.
ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY, L.P., et al., Appellants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants.
ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Mo. No. 2010-27.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Submitted January 19, 2010. Decided March 25, 2010.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 13 NY3d 382 (2009)].

Lee v. ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY, LP, 925 N.E.2d 920, 14 N.Y.3d 786 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

925 N.E.2d 920 (Lee v. ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. Astoria Generating Co.

920 N.E.2d 350 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)