Lee v. ARKLA Chemical Corp.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided October 20, 2022·No. 4:22-cv-04102·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

ANTOINETTE LEE PLAINTIFF

vs. Civil No. 4:22-cv-04102

ARKLA Chemical Corp., Sustainable Forests, LLC, Mark Thomas, Red Oak Operating, Holly Mound Land Co. and Walter Felton DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion and Motion for Service. ECF No. 3. Considering these motions, the Court finds they should be GRANTED, and Plaintiff may proceed in this case without payment of the filing fee. The Court directs the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the Complaint filed on October 18, 2022 (ECF No. 2) and a copy of this order on Defendants by serving them at the following addresses: ARKLA Chemical Corp. 400 E. Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

Sustainable Forests, LLC 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Mark Thomas 1997 Col. 34 Magnolia, Arkansas 71753

Red Oak Operating 1997 Col. 34 Magnolia, Arkansas 71753

Holly Mound Land Co. 12-B Lodge Road Lewisville, Arkansas 71845 Walter Felton 1478 O’Rear Rd. El Dorado, Arkansas 71730

without prepayment of fees and costs or security thereof. Defendants are ordered to answer within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. The Clerk is directed to prepare and issue a summons and a USM 285. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October 2022.

Barry A. Bryant /s/ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. ARKLA Chemical Corp., (W.D. Ark. 2022).

Lee v. ARKLA Chemical Corp. (Lee v. ARKLA Chemical Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.