Lee v. American Airlines Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Lee v. American Airlines Inc.

355 F.3d 386, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 441, 2004 WL 18008

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2004

Docket03-10178

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 355 F.3d 386 (Lee v. American Airlines Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee v. American Airlines Inc., 355 F.3d 386, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 441, 2004 WL 18008 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

*387 EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Following the delay and ultimate cancellation of Darren Lee’s flight from New York to London, Lee filed a federal class action complaint against - American Airlines, asserting a claim under Article 19 of the Warsaw Convention. 1 Lee sought to recover damages for delay, inconvenience, assorted expenses, loss of reasonably foreseeable business, loss of prepaid and/or nonrefundable vacation expenses, and loss of a “refreshing, memorable vacation.” The district court granted American Airlines partial judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), as to damages for inconvenience and loss of a refreshing, memorable vacation, reasoning that these allegations amounted to damages for mental injuries, unrecoverable under the Warsaw Convention. The district court subsequently certified this issue for appeal.

On appeal, Lee contends that his damages claims for inconvenience and loss of a refreshing, memorable vacation are economic damages and not claims for mental anguish damages. Specifically, Lee alleges American Airlines inconvenienced him by forcing him to spend time in a terminal without adequate food, water, restroom facilities and information regarding the status of his flight, by forcing him to spend the night in a dirty, substandard and unsafe motel room, and caused him to lose a full day of a memorable refreshing vacation.

We agree with the district court that, as alleged, Lee’s so-called inconvenience damages are not easily quantifiable and do not result in real economic loss. These alleged damages are merely an attempted re-characterization of mental anguish damages. Mental injury damages are not recoverable under the Warsaw Convention. See Eastern Airlines v. Floyd, 499 U.S. 530, 111 S.Ct. 1489, 113 L.Ed.2d 569 (1991) (finding that Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention does not allow recovery for purely mental injuries because the drafters of the Warsaw Convention did not intend to include such a remedy in the Convention). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the ruling of the district court.

1

. Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, Oct. 29, 1929, 49 Stat. 3000, T.S. No. 876 (1934), reprinted in 49 U.S.C. § 40105 (note) (2000) (hereinafter "Warsaw Convention”),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*387 EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Following the delay and ultimate cancellation of Darren Lee’s flight from New York to London, Lee filed a federal class action complaint against - American Airlines, asserting a claim under Article 19 of the Warsaw Convention. 1 Lee sought to recover damages for delay, inconvenience, assorted expenses, loss of reasonably foreseeable business, loss of prepaid and/or nonrefundable vacation expenses, and loss of a “refreshing, memorable vacation.” The district court granted American Airlines partial judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), as to damages for inconvenience and loss of a refreshing, memorable vacation, reasoning that these allegations amounted to damages for mental injuries, unrecoverable under the Warsaw Convention. The district court subsequently certified this issue for appeal.

On appeal, Lee contends that his damages claims for inconvenience and loss of a refreshing, memorable vacation are economic damages and not claims for mental anguish damages. Specifically, Lee alleges American Airlines inconvenienced him by forcing him to spend time in a terminal without adequate food, water, restroom facilities and information regarding the status of his flight, by forcing him to spend the night in a dirty, substandard and unsafe motel room, and caused him to lose a full day of a memorable refreshing vacation.

We agree with the district court that, as alleged, Lee’s so-called inconvenience damages are not easily quantifiable and do not result in real economic loss. These alleged damages are merely an attempted re-characterization of mental anguish damages. Mental injury damages are not recoverable under the Warsaw Convention. See Eastern Airlines v. Floyd, 499 U.S. 530, 111 S.Ct. 1489, 113 L.Ed.2d 569 (1991) (finding that Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention does not allow recovery for purely mental injuries because the drafters of the Warsaw Convention did not intend to include such a remedy in the Convention). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the ruling of the district court.

1

. Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, Oct. 29, 1929, 49 Stat. 3000, T.S. No. 876 (1934), reprinted in 49 U.S.C. § 40105 (note) (2000) (hereinafter "Warsaw Convention”),

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F.3d 386, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 441, 2004 WL 18008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-american-airlines-inc-ca5-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack