Lee v. 107th United States Congress

667 F. App'x 410
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2016·No. No. 16-1033·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s order and the district court clerk’s letter stating the requirements for filing an action in forma pauperis. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 64(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order and letter that Lee seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [411] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. 107th United States Congress, 667 F. App'x 410 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 410 (Lee v. 107th United States Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)