Lee Ronger v. Memorial Falls LLP

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 22, 2024
Docket01-24-00339-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lee Ronger v. Memorial Falls LLP (Lee Ronger v. Memorial Falls LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee Ronger v. Memorial Falls LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 22, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00339-CV ——————————— LEE RONGER, Appellant V. MEMORIAL FALLS LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1223273

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Lee Ronger, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 16,

2024 final judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The clerk’s record was filed on May 14, 2024, and on May 21, 2024, the court

reporter notified the Court that no record was taken in this case. Accordingly,

appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before June 20, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a). Appellant did not file an appellant’s brief.

On June 27, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal

was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was

filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of

appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of

prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply

with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond to the June 27, 2024 notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lee Ronger v. Memorial Falls LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-ronger-v-memorial-falls-llp-texapp-2024.