Lee Reddix v. Arkansas Dept of Workforce Svc
This text of Lee Reddix v. Arkansas Dept of Workforce Svc (Lee Reddix v. Arkansas Dept of Workforce Svc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1899 ___________________________
Lee Reddix
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________
Submitted: March 31, 2020 Filed: April 3, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Lee Reddix appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the
1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLC, 656 F.3d 782, 791 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lee Reddix v. Arkansas Dept of Workforce Svc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-reddix-v-arkansas-dept-of-workforce-svc-ca8-2020.