Lee Marvin Greenly v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
This text of 576 F. App'x 649 (Lee Marvin Greenly v. U.S. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lee Marvin Greenly and his company, Minnesota Wildlife Connection, Inc., petition for review of two orders of the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Secretary’s order revoking Greenly’s license under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), directing him and Minnesota Wildlife Connection to cease and desist from violating the AWA, and assessing a civil penalty of $11,725, see Cox v. USDA, 925 F.2d 1102, 1104 (8th Cir.1991) (standard of review), and we therefore deny the petition for review of the revocation order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also grant the Secretary’s motion to dismiss Greenly’s petition for review of a second order terminating Greenly’s license and disqualifying him from seeking a new one for two years.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
576 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-marvin-greenly-v-us-department-of-agriculture-ca8-2014.