Lee M. Gilley v. Christopher Bauer
Opinion
Opinion issued July 22, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
17, 2025, appellant filed an amended notice of appeal, seeking to appeal the First Amended Protective Order.
On July 9, 2025, appellant filed a “Notice of Nonsuit - Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal,” which we construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal. In his motion, appellant stated that he “no longer desire[d] to prosecute this [a]ppeal.” Appellant therefore seeks dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant).
No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference stating whether appellees, Christopher J. Bauer and Sharon Bauer, are opposed to the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days has passed and appellees have not responded to appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee M. Gilley v. Christopher Bauer (Lee M. Gilley v. Christopher Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.