Lee Kwok Dun v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
This text of 217 F.2d 21 (Lee Kwok Dun v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
95 U.S.App.D.C. 7
LEE KWOK DUN, Appellant,
v.
Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney General of the United
States, Appellee.
No. 11743.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 29, 1954.
Decided Nov. 18, 1954.
Writ of Certiorari Denied Jan. 31, 1955.
See 75 S.Ct. 341.
Mr. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Joseph M. F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C. with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, and William R. Glendon and William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered appearances for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff Lee Kwok Dun brought this suit against the Attorney General for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff is a citizen of the United States. The District Court, after a hearing, entered judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 F.2d 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-kwok-dun-v-herbert-brownell-jr-attorney-genera-cadc-1955.