Lee, Jr. v. Duncan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Lee, Jr. v. Duncan

16 So. 2d 31, 195 Miss. 799, 1943 Miss. LEXIS 180

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1943

DocketNo. 35478.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 So. 2d 31 (Lee, Jr. v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lee, Jr. v. Duncan, 16 So. 2d 31, 195 Miss. 799, 1943 Miss. LEXIS 180 (Mich. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

*802 Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The cause is controlled by the case of Homer P. Lee, Jr., et al., v. W. T. Boyd et al., 195 Miss. 794, 16 So. (2d) 30, this day decided, from which it follows that the appellant, Coates, must be held to be a bona fide purchaser for value of the property here involved, without notice of any defect in the title of his grantor thereto.

Affirmed as to Lee, but reversed and bill dismissed as to Coates.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*802 Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The cause is controlled by the case of Homer P. Lee, Jr., et al., v. W. T. Boyd et al., 195 Miss. 794, 16 So. (2d) 30, this day decided, from which it follows that the appellant, Coates, must be held to be a bona fide purchaser for value of the property here involved, without notice of any defect in the title of his grantor thereto.

Affirmed as to Lee, but reversed and bill dismissed as to Coates.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 So. 2d 31, 195 Miss. 799, 1943 Miss. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-jr-v-duncan-miss-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack