Lee H. Kessler v. Pettibone-Mulliken Corporation, a Corporation
205 F.2d 958, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 464
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 1953
Docket14779
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 205 F.2d 958 (Lee H. Kessler v. Pettibone-Mulliken Corporation, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lee H. Kessler v. Pettibone-Mulliken Corporation, a Corporation, 205 F.2d 958, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 464 (8th Cir. 1953).
Opinion
Judgment of District Court vacated, and case remanded for entry of final judgment by consent, etc., on motion of appellants and consent of appellees. 108 F.Supp. 748.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Yardley
493 F.2d 1389 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
205 F.2d 958, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-h-kessler-v-pettibone-mulliken-corporation-a-corporation-ca8-1953.