Lee E. Collins v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2022
Docket04-22-00215-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lee E. Collins v. the State of Texas (Lee E. Collins v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee E. Collins v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 20, 2022

No. 04-22-00215-CR

Lee E. COLLINS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-CR-6535 Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant is presently awaiting trial. On April 11, 2022, appellant pro se filed a document titled “Appeal” that fails to identify what order appellant intends to appeal. The document is styled as a filing in the 226th Judicial District Court; however, the document was mailed to the Fourth Court of Appeals. It is unclear whether the document is intended to be a motion to be filed in the trial court or a notice of appeal to be filed in this court.

The clerk’s record was filed on April 19, 2022. The clerk’s record does not contain an appealable order. As a general rule, a criminal defendant’s right of appeal is limited to an appeal from a final judgment of conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; see also State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (“A defendant’s general right to appeal under [article 44.02] and its predecessors has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment,’ though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face.”). Moreover, “[t]he courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.” Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (quoting Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)).

The notice of appeal does not indicate what appellant intends to appeal, and the record does not reflect either a final appealable order or an interlocutory order on which an immediate appeal is authorized. We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause no later than May 4, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. _________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apolinar v. State
820 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
State v. Sellers
790 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Ragston, Joshua Dewayne
424 S.W.3d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lee E. Collins v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-e-collins-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.