Lee David Arwine v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan and the Michigan Corrections Commission

319 F.2d 131, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 10, 1963·No. 15295_1·Published

Opinion

ORDER.

Oral argument having been waived, and the case having been submitted on the brief of the petitioner-appellant and *132 on the brief of the respondents-appellees, wherein the Attorney General and Solicitor General of the State of Michigan, as counsel for said respondents-appellees recognized that the recent opinion in the case of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) requires such action,

It Is Ordered that the district court order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be vacated and the case remanded to the district court for consideration on its merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee David Arwine v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan and the Michigan Corrections Commission, 319 F.2d 131, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035 (6th Cir. 1963).

319 F.2d 131 (Lee David Arwine v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan and the Michigan Corrections Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fay v. Noia
372 U.S. 391 (Supreme Court, 1963)