Lee David Arwine v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan and the Michigan Corrections Commission
This text of 319 F.2d 131 (Lee David Arwine v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan and the Michigan Corrections Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
Oral argument having been waived, and the case having been submitted on the brief of the petitioner-appellant and *132 on the brief of the respondents-appellees, wherein the Attorney General and Solicitor General of the State of Michigan, as counsel for said respondents-appellees recognized that the recent opinion in the case of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963) requires such action,
It Is Ordered that the district court order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be vacated and the case remanded to the district court for consideration on its merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 F.2d 131, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-david-arwine-v-william-h-bannan-warden-state-prison-of-southern-ca6-1963.