Lee, D., Pet v. Hon.
This text of Lee, D., Pet v. Hon. (Lee, D., Pet v. Hon.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
DEREK LEE, : No. 16 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID R. : CASHMAN, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus (and/or Extraordinary Relief)” are
DISMISED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid
representation is impermissible).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to
strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lee, D., Pet v. Hon., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-d-pet-v-hon-pa-2017.