Lee, D., Pet v. Hon.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 24, 2017·No. Lee, D., Pet v. Hon. ----- - No. 16 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

DEREK LEE, : No. 16 WM 2017 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID R. : CASHMAN, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus (and/or Extraordinary Relief)” are

DISMISED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid

representation is impermissible).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to

strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee, D., Pet v. Hon., (Pa. 2017).

Lee, D., Pet v. Hon. (Lee, D., Pet v. Hon.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)