Lee Anthony Haskin v. the State of Texas

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
• Decided: February 10, 2026
• Docket: 07-26-00001-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-26-00001-CR

LEE ANTHONY HASKIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 154th District Court Lamb County, Texas Trial Court No. DCR-5987-20, Honorable William C. Sowder, Visiting Judge Presiding

February 10, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Lee Anthony Haskin, appeals his conviction for evading arrest or

detention with a vehicle 1 and sentence to forty years of confinement. The trial court’s

certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case with no

right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2), (d). The record, however, does not contain a written plea agreement or waiver

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 38.04. of appeal, nor does the judgment reflect that Appellant was convicted pursuant to a plea

bargain agreement.

Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the

cause to the trial court to prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal

consistent with the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610,

613-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial

court’s certification comports to the record). The trial court shall utilize reasonable means

to secure Appellant’s signature on the amended certification. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The amended certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this

court by March 12, 2026.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.