Lee Anthony Haskin v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00001-CR
LEE ANTHONY HASKIN, APPELLANT V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 154th District Court Lamb County, Texas
Trial Court No. DCR-5987-20, Honorable William C. Sowder, Visiting Judge Presiding
February 10, 2025
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Lee Anthony Haskin, appeals his conviction for evading arrest or detention with a vehicle 1 and sentence to forty years of confinement. The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case with no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The record, however, does not contain a written plea agreement or waiver
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 38.04.
of appeal, nor does the judgment reflect that Appellant was convicted pursuant to a plea bargain agreement.
Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal consistent with the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial court’s certification comports to the record). The trial court shall utilize reasonable means to secure Appellant’s signature on the amended certification. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The amended certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this court by March 12, 2026.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee Anthony Haskin v. the State of Texas (Lee Anthony Haskin v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.