Lee A. Tharpe Construction Co. v. Chivers

194 So. 2d 612
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 1967
DocketNo. 35901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 So. 2d 612 (Lee A. Tharpe Construction Co. v. Chivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee A. Tharpe Construction Co. v. Chivers, 194 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. State
194 So. 2d 612 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-a-tharpe-construction-co-v-chivers-fla-1967.