Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes
122 F.3d 39, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7179, 97 Daily Journal DAR 11648, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23733, 1997 WL 560052
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 4, 1997·No. 95-15428·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes, 122 F.3d 39, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7179, 97 Daily Journal DAR 11648, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23733, 1997 WL 560052 (9th Cir. 1997).
122 F.3d 39 (Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. Estes
154 F.3d 952 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)