Leduc v. Williams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Leduc v. Williams

148 A. 919, 106 N.J.L. 247, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 181

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 3, 1930·Published

Opinion

*248 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Donges in the Circuit Court, and reported in 7 N. J. Mis. R. 342.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays,, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*248 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Donges in the Circuit Court, and reported in 7 N. J. Mis. R. 342.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays,, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Leduc v. Williams, 148 A. 919, 106 N.J.L. 247, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 181 (N.J. 1930).

Pincite

148 A. 919 (Leduc v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.