Ledsome v. U-Brand Corp.
498 U.S. 1019, 111 S. Ct. 663, 112 L. Ed. 2d 657, 59 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 25, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1991
DocketNo. 89-1060
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 498 U.S. 1019 (Ledsome v. U-Brand Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ledsome v. U-Brand Corp., 498 U.S. 1019, 111 S. Ct. 663, 112 L. Ed. 2d 657, 59 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 25, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064 (1991).
Opinion
Ct. App. Ohio, Ashland County. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Groves v. Ring Screw Works, ante, p. 168.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marshall v. DelPonte
606 A.2d 716 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1992)
State v. Geisler
594 A.2d 985 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
498 U.S. 1019, 111 S. Ct. 663, 112 L. Ed. 2d 657, 59 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 25, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledsome-v-u-brand-corp-scotus-1991.