Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge

696 So. 2d 1016, 1997 La. LEXIS 2186, 1997 WL 412121

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 2, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-1728

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1016 (Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 696 So. 2d 1016, 1997 La. LEXIS 2186, 1997 WL 412121 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Baton Rouge, City of; East Baton Rouge, Par. of; Greater Baton Rouge Airport Dt.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 418,727; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2572.

Denied. Relator may reurge the prescription issue on appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant and docket for argument. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Baton Rouge, City of; East Baton Rouge, Par. of; Greater Baton Rouge Airport Dt.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 418,727; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2572.

Denied. Relator may reurge the prescription issue on appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant and docket for argument. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 1016, 1997 La. LEXIS 2186, 1997 WL 412121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledoux-v-city-of-baton-rouge-la-1997.